U.S. State Dry Needling Scope of Practice Decisions
Resource:Federation of State Boards
The American Physical Therapy Association states that Dry Needling is within the scope of practice for a Physical Therapist. Several other health professions cite that dry needling is within their specific scope of practice as well. There are however, specific U.S. state rules, regulations and guidelines that do not permit the practice of dry needling. It is your responsibility to know, understand and practice within the specific rules, regulations and guidelines of your state, jurisdiction and professional license.
Master Dry Needling Seminars or TMR Seminars is solely an educational resource to provide the knowledge and technical skills necessary to deliver safe and effective dry needling treatment. Master Dry Needling Seminars or TMR Seminars does not make policy, claims, or interpretation on professional licensure or scope of practice. Master Dry Needling Seminars encourages all participants to contact their licensing board for official positions and rulings related to the practice of dry needling.
Alabama – Allowed
October 23 2007: Board Minutes: Acupuncture & Dry Needling does fall within the scope of practice for physical therapy.
Alaska – Allowed
April 24 2012: Letter regarding performance of dry needling. Paraphrase:The board will not address specific treatment approaches by licensure. However; expect the professionalism of the clinician to determine if they are qualified to provide the type of treatment in question or whether referral is more appropriate. The PT will be held accountable for demonstrating this competence if there is ever a complaint.
Arizona – Allowed
We meet all the requirements as per PT Board Guidelines. On April 25th, 2014 the Arizona physical therapy statute was amended to include dry needling within the physical therapy scope of practice. For PT Board Guidelines, click here
Arkansas – Allowed
The Arkansas Board of Physical Therapists has determined that Dry Needling is within the Scope Of Practice for physical therapists.
California – Not Allowed
Colorado – Allowed
Colorado Physical Therapy Licensure Rules and Regulations
4 CCR 732-1 RULE 11 – REQUIREMENTS FOR PHYSICAL THERAPISTS TO PERFORM DRY NEEDLING
Connecticut – Not specified. Status Unclear
Delaware – Allowed
July 1st. 2014: Delaware passed a bill that redefines and expands the ‘practice of physical therapy’ and ‘athletic training’ to include the use of dry needling treatment.
District of Columbia – Allowed
District of Columbia Municipal Regulations Title 17, Chapter 67, Physical Therapy
6715 SCOPE OF PRACTICE A physical therapist may also perform intramuscular manual therapy, which is also known as dry needling, if performed in conformance with the requirements of section 6716.
6716 REQUIREMENTS FOR PHYSICAL THERAPISTS TO PERFORM INTRAMUSCULAR MANUAL THERAPY
6716.1 Intramuscular manual therapy may be performed by a licensed physical therapist who meets the requirements of this section.
6716.2 Intramuscular manual therapy shall be performed directly by the licensed physical therapist and shall not be delegated.
6716.3 Intramuscular manual therapy shall be performed in a manner that is consistent with generally accepted standards of practice, including clean needle techniques, and other applicable standards of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6716.4 Intramuscular manual therapy is an advanced procedure that requires specialized training. A physical therapist shall not perform intramuscular manual therapy in the District of Columbia unless he or she has documented proof of completing:
(a) A board-approved professional training program on intramuscular manual therapy. The training program shall require each trainee to demonstrate cognitive and psychomotor knowledge and skills. The training program shall be attended in person by the physical therapist, shall not be attended online or through any other means of distance learning, and shall not be a self-study program
(b) A professional training program on intramuscular manual therapy accredited by the Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education (CAPTE). The training program shall require each trainee to demonstrate cognitive and psychomotor knowledge and skills. The training program shall be attended in person by the physical therapist, shall not be attended online or through any other means of distance learning, and shall not be a self-study program; or
(c) Graduate or higher-level coursework in a CAPTE-approved educational program that included intramuscular manual therapy in the curriculum.
6716.5 A physical therapist shall only perform intramuscular manual therapy following an examination and diagnosis, and for the purpose of treating specific anatomic entities selected according to physical signs.
6716.6 A physical therapist who performs intramuscular manual therapy shall obtain written informed consent from each patient who will receive intramuscular manual therapy before the physical therapist performs intramuscular manual therapy on the patient.
6716.7 The informed consent form shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(a) The patient’s signature;
(b) The risks and benefits of intramuscular manual therapy;
(c) The physical therapist’s level of education and training in intramuscular manual therapy; and
(d) A clearly and conspicuously written statement that the patient is not receiving acupuncture.
6716.8 A physical therapist who performs intramuscular manual therapy shall maintain a separate procedure note in the patient’s chart for each intramuscular manual therapy. The note shall indicate how the patient tolerated the intervention as well as the outcome after the intramuscular manual therapy.
6716.9 A physical therapist who performs intramuscular manual therapy shall be required to produce documentation of meeting the requirements of this section immediately upon request by the board or an agent of the board.
6716.10 Failure by a physical therapist to provide written documentation of meeting the training requirements of this section shall be deemed prima facie evidence that the physical therapist is not competent and not permitted to perform intramuscular manual therapy.
Florida – Not Allowed
Florida physical therapy practice act contains language which specifically excludes penetrating the skin in the performance of acupuncture: ‘Practice of physical therapy’ means the performance of physical therapy assessments and the treatment of any disability; injury; disease; or other health condition of human beings; or the prevention of such disability; injury; disease; or other condition of health and rehabilitation as related thereto by the use of the physical; chemical; and other properties of air; electricity; exercise; massage; the performance of acupuncture only upon compliance with the criteria set forth by the Board of Medicine; when no penetration of the skin occurs; The board has not yet taken up the issue of whether or not dry needling is acupuncture. For now; this statute prohibits dry needling in Florida.
Georgia – Allowed
2011 Dry needling added to GA PT practice act; only state to have in statute. Currently drafting rules for the statute.
Hawaii – Not Allowed
Physical therapists; by statute; are not allowed to puncture the skin of a patient for any purpose
Idaho – Now allows PT to take dry needling course
Here is the link to the new guidelines – Click Here
Illinois – Allowed
On July 3, 2017, a new bill authorizing dry needling by physical therapists in Illinois was sent to the Governor for his signature. The bill passed unanimously out of the House and Senate with bipartisan sponsorship and support. In summary, the new bill requires –
Indiana – Allowed
August 2012: Board meeting minutes – Claimed by some resources to have approved dry needling for PTs; minutes state that “Indiana does not take a position on needling. The current statute is open and does not specifically state whether or not it is appropriate.” Not prohibited; but not endorsed either. As an update to prior opinion in 2012 The IN APTA as of July 2013 has not declared a particular stance on dry needling but rather follows the National APTA White Paper on Dry Needling as within the scope of practice for PTs
Iowa – Allowed
On January 14, 2016, the Iowa Board of Physical & Occupational Therapy issued a Ruling on the Petition for Declaratory Order and concluded that dry needling is within the scope of physical therapy practice as defined in Iowa Code section 148A.1(1)(b).
On January 10, 2018, the Iowa Court of Appeals issued a decision upholding the declaratory order of the Iowa Board of Physical and Occupational Therapy that dry needling is within the scope of physical therapy. The Board issued its order in response to a petition filed in August of 2015 by the Iowa Association of Oriental Medicine and Acupuncture. The APTA and the Iowa Chapter petitioned to intervene and submitted a joint brief to the Board. The Board’s order, issued in January of 2016, declared that dry needling was a “rehabilitative procedure” within the definition of physical therapy in the practice act. The Acupuncture Association sought judicial review in the District Court. The Iowa Chapter intervened on the side of the Board. In October, 2016, the District Court affirmed the Board’s declaratory order.
The Acupuncture Association next filed an appeal, which the Iowa Supreme Court transferred to the Iowa Court of Appeals. The Iowa Chapter intervened in support of the Board and submitted a brief. The Court of Appeals held a hearing on December 12, 2017, at which the APTA’s General Counsel, Jack Bennett, argued on behalf of the Chapter. The opinion of the Court of Appeals noted that the standard of judicial review was highly deferential to the Board. The Court concluded:“The Board is generally allowed to apply its expertise in the area of physical therapy to determine what matters are within the scope of the practice. In granting deference to the Board’s expertise in the area of physical therapy, we conclude its determination that the practice of dry needling falls within the definition of physical therapy was not irrational, illogical, or wholly unjustifiable.”The decision by the Court of Appeals is not necessarily the end of the case, because the Acupuncture Association has seven days in which to ask the Court of Appeals for a rehearing, and it has twenty days in which to apply to the Iowa Supreme Court for further review of the case. The decision of the Court of Appeals is available here.
Kansas – Allowed
On May 13, 2016, Kansas Governor Sam Brownback signed legislation affecting the use of dry needling by physical therapists. The legislation clarifies that dry needling is within the scope of practice of physical therapy in Kansas. The new dry needling provisions in the physical therapy practice act will take effect July 1, 2016. Kansas is now working on developing rules and regulations for dry needling. On April 14, 2017, the Kansas Board of Healing Arts approved the Dry Needling Regulations for Physical Therapists in the state of Kansas.
The board is of the opinion dry needling is within the scope of the practice of physical therapy as defined in Kentucky law by the General Assembly at KRS 327.010(1). Dry needling is a treatment used to improve neuromuscular function. As such it falls within the definition of physical therapy as defined under KRS 327:010 (1): Physical therapy – means the use of selected knowledge and skills; invasive or noninvasive procedures with emphasis on the skeletal system; neuromuscular; and cardiopulmonary function; as it relates to physical therapy. There is nothing in KRS Chapter 327 to prohibit a licensed physical therapist from performing dry needling so long as the physical therapist is competent in performing this intervention.
While dry needling is within the scope of practice of physical therapy, a physical therapist must practice only those procedures that the physical therapist is competent to perform. The board can discipline a physical therapist for “engaging or permitting the performance of substandard patient care by himself or by persons working under their supervision due to a deliberate or negligent act or failure to act, regardless of whether actual injury to the patient is established.”
Subchapter B. General Provisions
§123. Definitions A. As used in this Title, the following terms and phrases, defined in the practice act, La. R.S.37:2401–2424, shall have the meanings specified here. Dry Needling—a physical intervention which utilizes filiform needles to stimulate trigger points in a patient’s body for the treatment of neuromuscular pain and functional movement deficits. Dry Needling is based upon Western medical concepts and does not rely upon the meridians utilized in acupuncture and other Eastern practices. A physical therapy evaluation will indicate the location, intensity and persistence of neuromuscular pain or functional deficiencies in a physical therapy patient and the propriety for utilization of dry needling as a treatment intervention. Dry needling does not include the stimulation of auricular points.
Minimum Criteria for Licensees in pursuit of Dry Needling Certification:
Licensee Procedures with the LPTB:
Maine – Allowed
June 17, 2016: The Board voted in full agreement that “dry needling” is a recognized technique associated with the practice of physical therapy and is an appropriate technique when used during the course of a physical therapy treatment.
The Maryland board of Physical Therapy Examiners ruled that dry needling is in the scope of practice of a Physical Therapist as long as they meet the minimum education and training requirements. A full description of the requirements is listed here.
Massachusetts – Unknown.
Michigan- Unclear : The Michigan Physical Therapy board has not ruled for or against physical therapists performing dry needling.
MINNESOTA – Unclear : The Minnesota Physical Therapy licensure board is silent on dry needling. The board is prohibited from making position statements.
Mississippi (APTA statement here) – Allowed
A.To be deemed competent to perform intramuscular manual therapy a physical therapist must meet the following requirements:
C(1)(a)&(b) and demonstrate a minimum of two years of intramuscular manual therapy practice techniques.
Missouri – Unknown
Montana – Allowed
24.177.413 DRY NEEDLING
(1) Dry needling is a skilled technique performed by a physical therapist using a mechanical device, filiform needles, to penetrate the skin and/or underlying tissues to affect change in body structures and functions for the evaluation and management of neuromusculoskeletal conditions, pain, movement impairments, and disability.
(2) Dry needling requires a physical therapy examination and diagnosis.
(3) Licensed physical therapists who perform dry needling must be able to demonstrate they have completed training in dry needling that must meet the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) GUIDELINES: STANDARDS OF QUALITY FOR CONTINUING EDUCATION OFFERINGS BOD G11-03-22-69 and/or the Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapists (FSBPT) STANDARDS FOR CONTINUING COMPETENCE ACTIVITIES.
(a) Dry needling courses must include, but not be limited to, training in indications, contraindications, potential risks, proper hygiene, proper use and disposal of needles, and appropriate selection of clients.
(b) Initial training in dry needling must include hands-on training, written, and practical examination as required by this rule.
(4) A licensed physical therapist must perform dry needling in a manner consistent with generally accepted standards of practice, including relevant standards of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, and Occupational Safety and Health Administration blood borne pathogen standards as per 29 CFR 1910.1030 et.seq.
(5) Dry needling shall only be performed by a licensed physical therapist and may not be delegated.
(6) The physical therapist performing dry needling must be able to provide written documentation, upon request by the board, which substantiates appropriate training as required by this rule. Failure to provide written documentation may result in disciplinary action.
Nebraska – Allowed
On July 8, 2016, the Attorney General of Nebraska, Mr. Douglas Peterson, issued a ruling that “If dry needling is defined using the descriptions provided to this office by the Board of Physical Therapy and the APTA, it is our opinion that a reasonable legal argument can be made that dry needling is a “mechanical modality” or a “physical agent or modality” and, therefore, falls within the statutory definition of physical therapy.” In addition, it was opinioned that dry needling was not within the scope of practice for OTs and Athletic Trainers. A copy of the legal opinion is available here.
A physical therapist who wished to perform tissue penetration for the purpose of dry needling must meet the following requirements:
Nevada – Allowed : Dry needling is within the scope of practice of physical therapists as ruled by NV Board of PT on March 20 2012. As of April 19 2012; the PT board legal counsel is writing up the new board Policy on dry needling and once signed by Chairman Kathy Sidener; dry needling will be permissible by PTs in NV.
New Hampshire – Allowed : October 19 2011: Physical Therapy Board Minutes: PTs can do dry needling if they have been trained to do so.
New Jersey – Not Allowed : On February 9, 2017, the Attorney General of New Jersey issued a statement that physical therapists are not authorized to engage in the practice of dry needling.
New Mexico – Allowed : March 2000: In a letter dated March 21 2000; the PT board determined that the PT Act does not prohibit dry needling and that Section 61-12D-3: Paragraph I: Number 2 – describing the practice of physical therapy supports that decision.
New York : Not Allowed
North Carolina – Allowed : On January 15th, 2015 the Rules Review Commission meeting restated the board’s opinion that dry needling is within the scope of practice of physical therapy. The Board also believes physical therapists can continue to perform dry needling so long as they possess the requisite education and training required by N.C.G.S. § 90-270.24(4), but there are no regulations to set the specific requirements for engaging in dry needling. APTA new guidelinesRead the RRC’s statement
On August 2, 2017, Louis A. Bledsoe, III, Special Superior Court Judge for Complex Business Cases of the North Carolina General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, ruled that physical therapists may perform dry needling. A copy of the legal opinion is available here. The Court’s ruling affirms a decision by the North Carolina Board of Physical Therapy Examiners that reached the following conclusions:
NORTH DAKOTA – Allowed : Board meeting May 13 2013: The board voted to state that ‘Dry Needling’ is within the scope of practice for PT in North Dakota.
Ohio – Allowed : It is the position of the Physical Therapy Section that nothing in the Ohio Physical Therapy Practice Act prohibits a physical therapist from performing dry needling techniques. As with any specialized procedure, the physical therapist must have training and demonstrate competency in the modality. The manner in which the training is obtained and competency demonstrated are not addressed in the Practice Act. The PT Board recommends you contact the OPTA for approved coursework in dry needling at www.ohiopt.org .
Oklahoma : Unknown.
Oregon – Unclear : On May 17, 2017, the Attorney General of Oregon issued a statement that dry needling is not within the scope of practice of a licensed Oregon Physical Therapist.
Pennsylvania – Not Allowed : Physical therapy board was advised by legal counsel that dry needling is not within the scope of practice of a physical therapist.
Rhode Island – Allowed : Feb 14 2012 PT board minutes: Board members revisited the matter of dry needling for intramuscular therapy. A board member questioned if it pertained to other professions; including Acupuncturist. The board administrator related guidance from attorney Tom Corrigan stating the use of a needle by one profession does not preclude a different profession from having a different use for a needle. Board members comment dry needling is within their scope of practice provided the licensed professional is comfortable trained and has appropriate background knowledge. For licensed physical therapists that are not qualified, there are educational seminars they may sign up for and gain the required background and training.
South Carolina – Allowed : In an email written in October 2004 in response to a licensed practitioners question regarding scope of practice and dry needling; the Chairperson affirmed that dry needling appears to fall within the SOP of a licensed PT in SC if they are fully trained in its use and comply with all legal and ethical requirements for professional practice in physical therapy.
South Dakota – Allowed : 20:66:04:02. Dry needling course of study. The board may approve a course of study in dry needling that meets the
following criteria:(1) The course of study shall include:(a) Surface anatomy as it relates to underlying tissues, organs, and other structures, including variations in form, proportion,
and anatomical landmarks;
(b) Both emergency preparedness and response procedures related to secondary physiological effects or complications with dry
(c) Both emergency preparedness and response procedures related to secondary emotional effects or complications associated
with dry needling;(d) Standards for dry needle handling;(e) Factors influencing safety and injury prevention;(f) Personal protection procedures and techniques as related to dry needling;(g) Theoretical basis for dry needling;(h) Theoretical basis for combining dry needling with other interventions;(i) Secondary effects or complications associated with dry needling on other systems;(j) Theoretical basis of pain sciences, including anatomy, physiology, pathophysiology, and relation to body structures and
function;(k) Indications, contraindications, and precautions related to dry needling;(l) Palpation techniques as related to dry needling;(m) Needle insertion techniques;(n) Needle manipulation techniques;(o) Physiological responses to dry needling; and(p) Solid filament needles;(2) The majority of the course of study shall be in-person. Courses held entirely online or by other distance learning will not
satisfy this requirement; and
(3) The physical therapist may only perform dry needling on the parts of the body included in the course of study.
Source: 45 SDR 9, effective August 1, 2018. General Authority: SDCL 36-10-52.Law Implemented: SDCL 36-10-52.
Tennessee – Allowed : On March 16, 2015, the House of Tennessee passed House Bill 25, which cleared the way for physical therapists in TN to start using dry needling again in clinical practice. The bill also clarifies that the Physical Therapy board will be required to establish minimum competency requirements for a physical therapist to practice dry needling. The bill also redefined “dry needling” to clarify that the practice is for the management, instead of evaluation and management of neuromusculoskeletal conditions, pain, and movement impairments. On March 23, 2015, the Senate of Tennessee passed the legislation. On April 9, 2015, Governor Bill Haslam signed the bill into law effective July 1, 2015
New Rule: 1150-01-.22 Dry Needling
(1) In order to perform dry needling, a physical therapist must obtain all of the educational instruction described in paragraphs (2)(a) and (2)(b) herein. All such educational instruction must be obtained in person and may not be obtained online or through video conferencing.
(2) Mandatory Training – Before performing dry needling, a practitioner must complete educational requirements in each of the following areas:
(a) Fifty (50) hours of instruction, to include instruction in each of the four areas listed herein, which are generally satisfied during the normal course of study in physical therapy school:
(b) Twenty-four (24) hours of dry needling specific instruction.
(i) Dry needling technique;
(ii) Dry needling indications and contraindications;
(iii) Documentation of dry needling;
(iv) Management of adverse effects;
(v) Practical psychomotor competency; and
(vi) Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s Bloodborne Pathogen Protocol.
(3) A newly-licensed physical therapist shall not practice dry needling for at least one (1) year from the date of initial licensure, unless the practitioner can demonstrate compliance with paragraph (2) through his or her pre-licensure educational coursework.
(4) Any physical therapist who obtained the requisite twenty-four (24) hours of instruction as described in paragraph (2)(b) in another state or country must provide the same documentation to the Board, as described in paragraph (2)(b), that is required of a course provider. The Board or its consultant must approve the practitioner’s dry needling coursework before the therapist can practice dry needling in this state.
(5) Dry needling may only be performed by a licensed physical therapist and may not be delegated to a physical therapist assistant or support personnel.
(6) A physical therapist practicing dry needling must supply written documentation, upon request by the Board, that substantiates appropriate training as required by this rule. (7) All physical therapy patients receiving dry needling for the first time shall be provided written documentation from the patient’s physical therapist that includes a definition and description of the practice of dry needling, a description of the education and training taken by the physical therapist which qualifies the therapist to practice dry needling, and a description of any potential side effects of dry needling, and the patient must give written informed consent after acknowledging the risks before dry needling may begin.
Texas – Allowed : Based on the broad definitions of physical therapy established by the Legislature and the Board, the Board has concluded that “dry needling is within the scope of practice of a Texas physical therapist. TX allows PT to take DN Courses and currently they do not have any specific credential hours-requirements, but they said that it is the responsibility of the Licensee to make sure that he/she is competent enough to incorporate DN in their practice and use it safely. They can use the credentials and practice it. But they should be competent enough and have the complete knowledge and safety rules of it.
For TX Licensed PTA : The Texas PT Practice Act/rules do not prohibit a PTA from performing dry needling. The supervising PT holds the primary responsible for all physical therapy care rendered under his/her supervision, and is responsible for assuring that a PTA has the competencies required to perform any treatment or modality, including dry needling. Consideration should be given to the PTA’s level of skill/training and experience/advanced competency, the practice setting in which the procedure is performed, the type of monitoring that might be needed, and the acuity and complexity of the patient’s condition. It would be a violation of the PT Practice Act/Rules for a PT to delegate a technique or procedure to a PTA who is not competent to perform it, and it would be a violation of the PT Practice Act/Rules for a PTA to perform or attempt to perform techniques or procedures for which they are not competent. It is recommended that you review the rules and regulations of payer sources, i.e. Medicare/Medicaid or private insurance, to determine if dry needling is reimbursable if performed by a PTA as they can differ from the licensure rules/regs.
For TX Licensed OTs :According to §362.1(32)(C)(xiii) of the OT Rules, occupational therapy interventions and procedures that promote or enhance safety and performance in activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), education, work, play, leisure, and social participation include the application of physical agent modalities, and use of a range of specific therapeutic procedures (such as wound care management; techniques to enhance sensory, perceptual, and cognitive processing; manual therapy techniques) to enhance performance skills. The Texas Board of Occupational Therapy Examiners does not dictate the specific modalities, techniques, or procedures that may be incorporated into the occupational therapy plan of care. However, at all times, it is the responsibility of the occupational therapy practitioners (OTs and OTAs) to demonstrate competency in all modalities, techniques, and procedures used for treatment. The occupational therapy practitioners must know how to perform and demonstrate proficiency in, as noted, any modalities, techniques, or procedures performed; however, please note that the Board does not specify certifications they must hold for specific modalities, etc. The occupational therapy practitioners are responsible for all of the modalities, techniques, or procedures that are used and the use of such must comply with the OT Rules and OT Practice Act. To access the full OT Rules and OT Practice Act, please follow the link http://www.ptot.texas.gov/page/ot-acts-and-rules
Utah – Allowed : On April 1: Utah Governor Gary R. Herbert signed into law HB 367. The legislation amends the Utah physical therapy statute to specifically add dry needling to the physical therapist scope of practice. Read the full scope of practice amendments. Requirements
Vermont – Allowed : On June 22, 2015, the Office of Regulation replied pointing out that “under the existing law, the Vermont Office of Professional Regulation believes that physical therapists reasonably may practice TDN if appropriately trained and experienced, and if the therapy is reasonably indicated for the relief of an impairment of physical movement.”
Virginia – Allowed : July 18 2012: Opinion of the West Virginia Board of Physical Therapy Regarding Dry Needling Therapy: In summary; the Board is of the opinion that dry needling is within the scope of the practice of ‘physical therapy’ as defined by West Virginia Code.
Board of Physical Therapy : Guidance on Dry Needling in the Practice of Physical Therapy
Upon recommendation from the Task Force on Dry Needling, the Board voted that dry needling is within the scope of practice of physical therapy but should only be practiced under the following conditions:
Dry needling is a technique used in physical therapy practice to treat trigger points in muscles. You should understand that this dry needling technique should not be confused with a complete acupuncture treatment performed by a licensed acupuncturist. A complete acupuncture treatment might yield a holistic benefit not available through a limited dry needling treatment
Guidance Document 112-9
Board of Physical Therapy Guidance on Dry Needling in the Practice of Physical Therapy
Upon recommendation from the Task Force on Dry Needling, the board voted that dry needling is within the scope of practice of physical therapy but should only be practiced under the following conditions:
Dry needling is not an entry level skill but an advanced procedure that requires additional training.
A physical therapist using dry needling must complete at least 54 hours of post professional training including providing evidence of meeting expected competencies that include demonstration of cognitive and psychomotor knowledge and skills.
The licensed physical therapist bears the burden of proof of sufficient education and training to ensure competence with the treatment or intervention.
Dry needling is an invasive procedure and requires referral and direction, in accordance with § 54.1-3482 of the Code of Virginia. Referral should be in writing and specific for dry needling; if the initial referral is received orally, it must be followed up with a written referral.
If dry needling is performed, a separate procedure note for each treatment is required, and notes must indicate how the patient tolerated the technique as well as the outcome after the procedure.
A patient consent form should be utilized and should clearly state that the patient is not receiving acupuncture. The consent form should include the risks and benefits of the technique, and the patient should receive a copy of the consent form. The consent form should contain the following explanation:
Dry needling is a technique used in physical therapy practice to treat trigger points in muscles. You should understand that this dry needling technique should not be confused with a complete acupuncture treatment performed by a licensed acupuncturist. A complete acupuncture treatment might yield a holistic benefit not available through a limited dry needling treatment.
Washington – Not Allowed :The statute that defines the practice of physical therapy allows a variety of interventions, but we conclude that the best reading of the statute excludes dry needling from the practice of physical therapy. Our conclusion is based solely on the law as currently written; it is not our role to weigh the policy benefits and drawbacks of authorizing physical therapists to engage in dry needling. The legislature, of course, could also expand the scope of physical therapy by amending the relevant statutes. Here is a link to the full AG’s opinion. On April 15, 2016, the Attorney General of Washington State concluded that “The definition of the practice of physical therapy indicates that the legislature did not intend to include dry needling within the scope of practice. We have been informed of many reasons for including dry needling in the practice of physical therapy and arguments to the contrary, but our role is not to resolve such public policy disputes. We conclude only that RCW 18.74, as currently written and implemented, does not encompass dry needling in the practice of physical therapy.”
West Virginia – Allowed :July 18 2012: Opinion of the West Virginia Board of Physical Therapy Regarding Dry Needling Therapy: In summary; the Board is of the opinion that dry needling is within the scope of the practice of ‘physical therapy’ as defined by West Virginia Code.
Wisconsin – Allowed :July 2009 Board Minutes: Discussion of Dry Needling – Statute 448.50 (6) allows for ‘therapeutic intervention’ within the scope of physical therapy. Larry Nosse discussed the use of dry needling as a therapeutic technique. This process uses sterile techniques; the surface skin is cleaned; it does not draw blood and the physical therapists are trained in blood-body precautions. Mark Shropshire noted that the American Academy of Orthopedic and Manual Physical Therapists has made a position statement that dry needling is within the scope of practice of physical therapy. California; Nevada; Tennessee; and Florida do not allow this technique within the scope of practice within physical therapy because these states have language noting that PTs cannot puncture the skin. MOTION: Otto Cordero moved; seconded by Jane Stroede that the board considers trigger point dry needling as within the scope of practice of physical therapy provided that the licensed physical therapist is properly educated and trained. Motion carried unanimously.
Wyoming – Allowed :In a letter dated Aug 18 2009: the Wyoming Board of Physical Therapy affirmed that nothing in the current practice act would preclude PTs performing dry needling with proper credentials. Only PTs allowed. Click Here for more info
Copyright © 2019 Total Motion Physical Therapy Inc. All Rights Reserved.